ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Evaluating the relationship between
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection withFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Helicobacter pylori and cardiovascular risk: Only a dead Helicobacter is a good Helicobacter?Helicobacter · 2022Article
- Are Any Changes in Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Among Adult Bantu Central African Hypertensive Patients from Monkole and Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospitals?Vascular health and risk management · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
methodsThis study was done on patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy and biopsy, and after obtaining conscious consent underwent ultrasound of the right and left carotid arteries for measuring carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and blood tests.
resultsIn this study, 90 patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy were examined in three groups: negative H. pylori negative, positive cagA and negative cagA. The right, left and average of CIMT in cagA-positive group were significantly higher than the other two groups (p < 0.05). Howerver, the average of CIMT was not significantly different between men and women. Also, the hsCRP average level in positive cagA group was significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur findings suggest that there is an increase in CIMT values in patients with H. pylori infection, especially in cases of positive cagA. The positive cagA group showed significantly higher levels of hs-CRP, as a marker of elevated inflammatory response. Therefore,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.