ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Detection of 3D Arterial Centerline Extraction in Spiral CT Coronary Angiography.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Detection of 3D Arterial Centerline Extraction in Spiral CT Coronary Angiography.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an in-depth study and analysis of the 3D arterial centerline in spiral CT coronary angiography, and constructs its detection and extraction technique. The first time, the distance transform is used to complete the boundary search of the original figure; the second time, the distance transform is used to calculate the value of the distance transform of all voxels, and according to the value of the distance transform, unnecessary voxels are deleted, to complete the initial contraction of the vascular region and reduce the computational consumption in the next process; then, the nonwitnessed voxels are used to construct the maximum inner joint sphere model and find the skeletal voxels that can reflect the shape of the original figure. Finally, the skeletal lines were optimized on these initially extracted skeletal voxels using a dichotomous-like principle to obtain the final coronary artery centerline. Through the evaluation of the experimental results, the algorithm can extract the coronary centerline more accurately. In this paper, the segmentation method is evaluated on the test set data by two kinds of indexes: one is the index of segmentation result evaluation, including dice coefficient, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity; the other is the index of clinical diagnosis result evaluation, which is to refine the segmentation result for vessel diameter detection. The results obtained in this paper were compared with the physicians' labeling results. In terms of network performance, the Dice coefficient obtained in this paper was 0.89, the accuracy was 98.36%, the sensitivity was 93.36%, and the specificity was 98.76%, which reflected certain advantages in comparison with the advanced methods proposed by previous authors. In terms of clinical evaluation indexes, by performing skeleton line extraction and diameter calculation on the results obtained by the segmentation method proposed in this paper, the absolute error obtained after comparing with the diameter of the labeled image was 0.382 and the relative error was 0.112, which indicates that the segmentation method in this paper can recover the vessel contour more accurately. Then, the results of coronary artery centerline extraction with and without fine branch elimination were evaluated, which proved that the coronary artery centerline has higher accuracy after fine branch elimination. The algorithm is also used to extract the centerline of the complete coronary artery tree, and the results prove that the algorithm has better results for the centerline extraction of the complete coronary vascular tree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.