Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471474›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2021

What Surgeons Want: Access to Online Surgical Education and Peer-to-Peer Counseling-A Qualitative Study.

Astrid D Häberle, Riya Nath, Shelley N Facente, Autumn E Albers, Sabine Girod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Astrid D HäberleDepartment of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-540X
Riya NathSSPIRE, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shelley N FacenteFacente Consulting, Richmond, CA, USA.
Autumn E AlbersFacente Consulting, Richmond, CA, USA.
Sabine GirodSSPIRE, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-6076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMixed methods study including quantitative data analysis and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews.

objectivesUtilizing information and communication technology can facilitate professional communication within health care on a global scale. This study aimed to identify the educational and peer-to-peer communication needs of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgeons across the globe, determine preferred modes of communication, and assess technological and other barriers to online education and peer-to-peer communication.

methodsWe performed semi-structured videoconference interviews of 92 CMF surgeons from around the globe, with the largest number in the Asia/Pacific region, the Middle East, and Latin America. We triangulated quantitative summaries with qualitative themes to improve validity and enable a more comprehensive understanding of participant perspectives.

resultsThe interviews revealed 3 main areas of technology use:

conclusionCMF surgeons embraced communication technologies that allowed them to quickly obtain knowledge especially on new surgical technology, discuss cases on demand, and maintain strong communication with their global peers.

Indexed as

online educationpeer-to-peer communicationsocial mediatechnology

Identifiers

PMID34471474
PMCPMC8385627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.