Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471400›Full record

SynthesisOccupational therapy international2021

Performance-Based Executive Function Instruments Used by Occupational Therapists for Children: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Ivan Neil B Gomez, Sharleen Alyssa M Palomo, Ana Melissa U Vicuña, Jose Antonio D Bustamante, Jillian Marie E Eborde, Krishna A Regala, Gwyn Marie M Ruiz, Andrea Lorraine G Sanchez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational therapy international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan Neil B GomezCenter for Health Research and Movement Science, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-2062
Sharleen Alyssa M PalomoThe Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-6704
Ana Melissa U VicuñaThe Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-8376
Jose Antonio D BustamanteDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-9680
Jillian Marie E EbordeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-4303
Krishna A RegalaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-1567
Gwyn Marie M RuizDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-8990
Andrea Lorraine G SanchezDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-0965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of executive function (EF) instruments to assess children's functional performance is obscured with a lack of consensus on which is most suitable to use within the occupational therapy profession. This review identifies EF instruments used by occupational therapists (OTs) for children and evaluates their measurement properties.

methodsThis systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020172107). We reviewed occupational therapy-related studies published until March 2021, to identify performance-based EF instruments used among children by OTs. Two review authors independently screened, extracted, and evaluated the methodological rigor of the included studies. Adequacy of the measurement properties was determined using the COSMIN, and the Terwee criteria were used for synthesis of best evidence.

resultsFive EF assessments were found across eight study articles: Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children, Children's Cooking Task, Children's Kitchen Task Assessment, Do-Eat, and Preschool Executive Task Assessment. Adequacy of measurement properties and synthesis of best evidence varied, leading to a low GRADE rating on the certainty of evidence for the included instruments.

conclusionsThere is limited evidence that supports the certainty of evidence on the measurement properties of the reviewed tools in helping OTs assess performance-based EF among children. Nevertheless, the authors conditionally suggest their use based on the critical need to measure children's EF. Further research is needed to establish the measurement properties of these measures across different childhood populations.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionOccupational TherapyChildChild, PreschoolHumansOccupational Therapists

Identifiers

PMID34471400
PMCPMC8374859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.