ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2021
Synchronous Screen-Based Simulation in Anesthesia Distance Education.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual reality is emerging training applications for anesthesia simulation.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Pediatric Critical Care in Resource Limited Settings-Lessening the Gap Through Ongoing Collaboration, Advancement in Research and Technological Innovations.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Comparison of discussion-based and simulation-based learning methods using the Gas ManJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of synchronous online screen-based simulation (SBS) in anesthesia education.
methodsThe investigational cohort consisted of 12 second-year nurse anesthesia students enrolled in a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program. Pairs of students worked with a single instructor online using the same SBS employing a cloud-based peer-to-peer platform and high-fidelity software involving a graphical avatar. During each session, the instructor initially manipulated the avatar through the software scenario with educational pauses to communicate learning content. Thereafter, students proceeded through the same SBS by stating their desired actions, which were then implemented by the instructor. At the conclusion of each session, students were evaluated by an integrated software scoring system, and thereafter they completed a questionnaire rating their distance SBS experience.
resultsSynchronous online SBS was performed in this manner without difficulty; it was accepted by students as a valuable adjunct to their in-person mannequin-based simulation (MBS) training; and it was perceived as a useful addition to their anesthesia education. Students identified significant value in the isolation of the cognitive component of learning by this teaching methodology. Lack of haptic learning, however, also was seen as a disadvantage of SBS compared to MBS. Students' criticisms of SBS were largely unrelated to use of this technique with synchronous online education, but rather related to general limitations associated with SBS technology. There was a positive correlation between the students' mean post-SBS rating and the automated SBS score (r = 0.832).
conclusionSynchronous online SBS can effectively supplement MBS in an anesthesia training program. Its major perceived advantage appears to be an ability to isolate and reinforce appropriate cognitive skills related to intraoperative care including crisis management. Students who had higher mean post-SBS ratings also had higher automated SBS scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.