Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471390›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of clinical trials2020

Taking Optogenetics into the Human Brain: Opportunities and Challenges in Clinical Trial Design.

Michael White, Michael Mackay, Roger Whittaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Optogenetic Brain-Computer Interfaces.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Ethics and regulation of neuronal optogenetics in the European Union.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. PET reporter systems for the brain.Trends in neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Optogenetics in Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Astrocytes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael WhiteTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Michael MackayTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Roger WhittakerTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics, the use of light to control the activity of suitably sensitized cells, has led to major advances in the field of basic neuroscience since it first emerged in 2005. Already, the technique has entered clinical trials for conditions such as Retinitis Pigmentosa. A major focus of interest is the use of optogenetics within the brain, where the ability to precisely control the activity of specific subsets of neurons could lead to novel treatments for a wide range of disorders from epilepsy to schizophrenia. However, since any therapy would require both the use of gene therapy techniques to introduce non-human proteins, and implantable electronic devices to provide optical stimulation, applying this technique in the brain presents a unique set of obstacles and challenges. This review looks at the reasons why researchers are exploring the use of optogenetics within the brain. It then explores the challenges facing scientists, engineers and clinicians wanting to take this technology from the lab into the first human brain, discussing different possibilities for a first-in-human clinical trial from a sponsor, patient and regulatory perspective.

Indexed as

First-in-HumanGene TherapyImplantable DeviceNeuroscienceOpsins

Identifiers

PMID34471390
PMCPMC7611592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.