Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471363›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021

Methicillin-Resistant

Isabel Baroja, Sara Guerra, Marco Coral-Almeida, Alejandra Ruíz, Juan Miguel Galarza, Jacobus H de Waard, Carlos Bastidas-Caldes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. IDCases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Microbiome of the Public Transport System of Quito, Ecuador.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Characteristics of Virulent ST5-SCCInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  11. Nasal Carriage Rate ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel BarojaFacultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Sara GuerraFacultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Marco Coral-AlmeidaGrupo de Bio-Quimioinformatica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-0211-2906
Alejandra RuízUnidad Técnica de Genética Molecular, Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, Quito, Ecuador.
Juan Miguel GalarzaUnidad Técnica de Genética Molecular, Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, Quito, Ecuador.
Jacobus H de WaardOne Health Research Group, Facultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-4118-1015
Carlos Bastidas-CaldesFacultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-7700
Universidad de Las Américas · ECCentral University of Ecuador · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethicillin-resistant PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of colonization with

methodsOut of a cohort of 3800 HCWs, 481 individuals from different hospital departments were randomly selected, and a single nasal swab was collected. Detection of SA and MRSA was carried out with the LightCycler

resultsColonization with SA and MRSA occurred in respectively 23.7% (95% CI, 22.7-24.6) and 5% (95% CI, 3.39-7.58) of the individuals. The multivariate analysis showed that being older in age (OD 1.09) and being male (OD 2.78) were risk factors for SA and MRSA colonization (

conclusionAbout 20% of the HCWs who were colonized with SA were colonized with MRSA, representing a risk for nosocomial infections and hospital outbreaks. Active monitoring and a decolonization treatment of the HCWs can reduce these risks.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancecolonizationHCWshealth care workersmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMRSArisk factorsSAStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34471363
PMCPMC8403571
OpenAlexW3196165735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.