Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471331›Full record

ArticleGlobal environmental change : human and policy dimensions2021

How EU policies could reduce nutrient pollution in European inland and coastal waters.

B Grizzetti, O Vigiak, A Udias, A Aloe, M Zanni, F Bouraoui, A Pistocchi, C Dorati, R Friedland, A De Roo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Harmful algal blooms in inland waters.Nature reviews. Earth & environment · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

B GrizzettiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
O VigiakEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
A UdiasEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
A AloeArhs Developments, Italy.
M ZanniArhs Developments, Italy.
F BouraouiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
A PistocchiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
C DoratiArhs Developments, Italy.
R FriedlandEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
A De RooEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
C Benitez SanzEmgrisa, Madrid, Spain.
A LeipEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
M BielzaSeidor, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive agriculture and densely populated areas represent major sources of nutrient pollution for European inland and coastal waters, altering the aquatic ecosystems and affecting their capacity to provide ecosystem services and support economic activities. Ambitious water policies are in place in the European Union (EU) for protecting and restoring aquatic ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. This research quantified the current pressures of point and diffuse nitrogen and phosphorus emissions to European fresh and coastal waters (2005-2012), and analysed the effects of three policy scenarios of nutrient reduction: 1) the application of measures currently planned in the Rural Development Programmes and under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); 2) the full implementation of the UWWTD and the absence of derogations in the Nitrates Directive; 3) high reduction of nutrient, using best technologies in wastewaters treatment and optimal fertilisation in agriculture. The results of the study show that for the period 2005-2012, the nitrogen load to European seas was 3.3-4.1 TgN/y and the phosphorus load was 0.26-0.30 TgP/y. Policy measures supporting technological improvements (third scenario) could decrease the nutrient export to the seas up to 14% for nitrogen and 20% for phosphorus, improving the ecological status of rivers and lakes, but widening the nutrient imbalance in coastal ecosystems (i.e. increasing nitrogen availability with respect to phosphorus), affecting eutrophication. Further nutrient reductions could be possible by a combination of measures especially in the agricultural sector. However, without tackling current agricultural production and consumption system, the reduction might not be sufficient for achieving the goals of EU water policy in some regions. The study analysed the expected changes and the source contribution in different European regional seas, and highlights the advantages of addressing the land-sea dynamics, checking the coherence of measures taken under different policies.

Indexed as

EU Marine Strategy Framework DirectiveEU Water Framework DirectiveNutrient pollutionPolicy scenarios

Identifiers

PMID34471331
PMCPMC8386246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.