ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantitative analysis of metastatic breast cancer in mice using deep learning on cryo-image data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D whole body preclinical micro-CT database of subcutaneous tumors in mice with annotations from 3 annotators.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Preparing Data for Artificial Intelligence in Pathology with Clinical-Grade Performance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Optimal slice thickness for improved accuracy of quantitative analysis of fluorescent cell and microsphere distribution in cryo-images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Spleen Tissue Segmentation Algorithm for Cryo-Imaging Data.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Deep learning multi-organ segmentation for whole mouse cryo-images including a comparison of 2D and 3D deep networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-imaging sections and images a whole mouse and provides ~ 120-GBytes of microscopic 3D color anatomy and fluorescence images, making fully manual analysis of metastases an onerous task. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based metastases segmentation algorithm included three steps: candidate segmentation, candidate classification, and semi-automatic correction of the classification result. The candidate segmentation generated > 5000 candidates in each of the breast cancer-bearing mice. Random forest classifier with multi-scale CNN features and hand-crafted intensity and morphology features achieved 0.8645 ± 0.0858, 0.9738 ± 0.0074, and 0.9709 ± 0.0182 sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), with fourfold cross validation. Classification results guided manual correction by an expert with our in-house MATLAB software. Finally, 225, 148, 165, and 344 metastases were identified in the four cancer mice. With CNN-based segmentation, the human intervention time was reduced from > 12 to ~ 2 h. We demonstrated that 4T1 breast cancer metastases spread to the lung, liver, bone, and brain. Assessing the size and distribution of metastases proves the usefulness and robustness of cryo-imaging and our software for evaluating new cancer imaging and therapeutics technologies. Application of the method with only minor modification to a pancreatic metastatic cancer model demonstrated generalizability to other tumor models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.