Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34471164›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Selectivity of direct plasma treatment and plasma-conditioned media in bone cancer cell lines.

Inès Hamouda, Cédric Labay, Uroš Cvelbar, Maria-Pau Ginebra, Cristina Canal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inès HamoudaBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering (CREB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10-14, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.
Cédric LabayBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering (CREB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10-14, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.
Uroš CvelbarDepartment of Gaseous Electronics (F-6), Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maria-Pau GinebraBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering (CREB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10-14, 08019, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina CanalBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering (CREB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Av. Eduard Maristany 10-14, 08019, Barcelona, Spain. cristina.canal@upc.edu.
Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de DéuUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESJožef Stefan Institute · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric pressure plasma jets have been shown to impact several cancer cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo. These effects are based on the biochemistry of the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generated by plasmas in physiological liquids, referred to as plasma-conditioned liquids. Plasma-conditioned media are efficient in the generation of reactive species, inducing selective cancer cell death. However, the concentration of reactive species generated by plasma in the cell culture media of different cell types can be highly variable, complicating the ability to draw precise conclusions due to the differential sensitivity of different cells to reactive species. Here, we compared the effects of direct and indirect plasma treatment on non-malignant bone cells (hOBs and hMSCs) and bone cancer cells (SaOs-2s and MG63s) by treating the cells directly or exposing them to previously treated cell culture medium. Biological effects were correlated with the concentrations of reactive species generated in the liquid. A linear increase in reactive species in the cell culture medium was observed with increased plasma treatment time independent of the volume treated. Values up to 700 µM for H

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCulture Media, ConditionedHumansOsteosarcomaPlasma GasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesCulture Media, ConditionedPlasma GasesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID34471164
PMCPMC8410816
OpenAlexW3197242183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.