Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470842›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2021

Assessment of dermatologists' perception of utilizing teledermatology during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.

Hatoun M Almaziad, Abdulrahman I Alfawzan, Norah K Alkhayal, Rayan A Alkhodair

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.Current dermatology reports · 2022
    Review
  4. A Review on Teledermatology in Saudi Arabia: Framework, Barriers, and Opportunities.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hatoun M AlmaziadFrom the Department of Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery (Almaziad), Prince Sultan Military Medical City; from the College of Medicine (Alfawzan, Alkhodair), King Saud University for Health Sciences; and from the Department of Medicine (Alkhayal, Alkhodair), Division of Dermatology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman I AlfawzanFrom the Department of Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery (Almaziad), Prince Sultan Military Medical City; from the College of Medicine (Alfawzan, Alkhodair), King Saud University for Health Sciences; and from the Department of Medicine (Alkhayal, Alkhodair), Division of Dermatology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Norah K AlkhayalFrom the Department of Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery (Almaziad), Prince Sultan Military Medical City; from the College of Medicine (Alfawzan, Alkhodair), King Saud University for Health Sciences; and from the Department of Medicine (Alkhayal, Alkhodair), Division of Dermatology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rayan A AlkhodairFrom the Department of Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery (Almaziad), Prince Sultan Military Medical City; from the College of Medicine (Alfawzan, Alkhodair), King Saud University for Health Sciences; and from the Department of Medicine (Alkhayal, Alkhodair), Division of Dermatology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess teledermatology (TD) perception among dermatologists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify the most common advantages and disadvantages of TD.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study to address Saudi dermatologist perceptions of TD from July 2020 to December 2020, during Covid-19 pandemic.

resultsOut of 664 emails sent, 107 complete responses were returned. Approximately 40.2% used TD through phone calls, followed by those who used a virtual clinic (32.7%). Also, the best way to use TD, according to respondents, was for triage before inpatient and outpatient visits. When we compared the use of TD in the outpatient and inpatient settings, outpatient responses always had more positive attitudes than inpatients. The most important benefit of TD is to reduce the risk of pandemic infections (69%). More than half of the participants sometimes used TD for diagnosis (n=63, 58.9%) and management (n=59, 55.1%), and 69 (64.5%) considered using it in the future.

conclusionOur survey-based study indicates that TD is an important part in the future dermatology because our participants agreed that TD decreases cost, increases access to dermatology care, and reduces the risk of pandemic infections. And it is necessary to establish an infrastructure for TD that protects patient's privacy and ensures accurate diagnosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19DermatologistsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPerceptionSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaCOVID-19Saudi ArabiaTeledermatology

Identifiers

PMID34470842
PMCPMC9280508
OpenAlexW3198707756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.