ArticleBJPsych open2021
NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.
Article in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Informing the development of a decision aid: Expectations and wishes from service users and psychiatrists towards a decision aid for antipsychotics in the inpatient setting.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- [When AI is involved in making decisions. Ethical considerations on shared decision-making in psychotherapeutic-psychiatric treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Article
- Lived experiences of shared decision-making in young adults prescribed antipsychotics: a qualitative interview study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Shared decision making in eating disorders: the patient and clinician perspectives.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Mobile App Designed to Promote Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Conversations Between Family Members and Physicians in Intensive Care Unit During Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Observational Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Review
- Hype or hope? Ketamine for the treatment of depression: results from the application of deep learning to Twitter posts from 2010 to 2023.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Military culture and collaborative decision-making in mental healthcare: cultural, communication and policy considerations.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Peer support and shared decision making in Open Dialogue: Opportunities and recommendations.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Correlation analysis between physicians' evaluations of doctor-patient relationship and their preferences for shared decision-making in China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.PloS one · 2022Article
- NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation - CORRIGENDUM.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- Disparities in Shared Decision-Making Research and Practice: The Case for Black American Patients.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initiated an ambitious effort to develop the first shared decision making guidelines. The purpose of this commentary is to identify three main concerns pertaining to the new published guidelines for shared decision making research, practice, implementation and cultural differences in mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.