ArticleStem cell research & therapy2021
Transcriptome-wide m
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging Role of Epitranscriptomics in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- FTO-mediated m6A modification regulates the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by targeting FOXO1.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- N6-Methyladenosine Modification of the Three Components "Writers", "Erasers", and "Readers" in Relation to Osteogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to diseases: the crucial role of mStem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Combined Analysis of Second- and Third-Generation Transcriptome Sequencing for Gene Characteristics and Identification of Key Splicing Variants in Wound Healing of Ganxi Goat Skin.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The mStem cells international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAdipose-derived stem cells are frequently used for bone regeneration both in vitro and in vivo. N MATERIALS AND
methodshASCs were harvested after being cultured in a basic or osteogenic medium for 7 days, and the osteogenic differentiation was validated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin Red S staining, ALP activity assay, and qRT-PCR analysis of ALP, RUNX2, BGLAP, SPP1, SP7, and COL1A1 genes. The m
resultsIn total, 1145 differentially methylated peaks, 2261 differentially expressed genes, and 671 differentially methylated and expressed genes (DMEGs) were identified. GO and KEGG pathway analyses conducted for these DMEGs revealed extensive and osteogenic biological functions. The "PI3K-Akt signaling pathway"; "MAPK signaling pathway"; "parathyroid hormone synthesis, secretion, and action"; and "p53 signaling pathway" were significantly enriched, and the DMEGs in these pathways were identified as m
conclusionsThe total m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.