Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470666›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2021

De novo transcriptomic subtyping of colorectal cancer liver metastases in the context of tumor heterogeneity.

Seyed H Moosavi, Peter W Eide, Ina A Eilertsen, Tuva H Brunsell, Kaja C G Berg, Bård I Røsok, Kristoffer W Brudvik, Bjørn A Bjørnbeth, Marianne G Guren, Arild Nesbakken and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multiregional profiling revealsScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanisms of metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Role of Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seyed H MoosaviDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Peter W EideDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Ina A EilertsenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Tuva H BrunsellDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Kaja C G BergDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Bård I RøsokK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Kristoffer W BrudvikK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn A BjørnbethK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne G GurenK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Arild NesbakkenK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Anita SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway. anita.sveen@rr-research.no.ORCID 0000-0001-8219-6251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene expression-based subtyping has the potential to form a new paradigm for stratified treatment of colorectal cancer. However, current frameworks are based on the transcriptomic profiles of primary tumors, and metastatic heterogeneity is a challenge. Here we aimed to develop a de novo metastasis-oriented framework.

methodsIn total, 829 transcriptomic profiles from patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed, including primary tumors, liver metastases, and non-malignant liver samples. High-resolution microarray gene expression profiling was performed of 283 liver metastases from 171 patients treated by hepatic resection, including multiregional and/or multi-metastatic samples from each of 47 patients. A single randomly selected liver metastasis sample from each patient was used for unsupervised subtype discovery by nonnegative matrix factorization, and a random forest prediction model was trained to classify multi-metastatic samples, as well as liver metastases from two independent series of 308 additional patients.

resultsInitial comparisons with non-malignant liver samples and primary colorectal tumors showed a highly variable degree of influence from the liver microenvironment in metastases, which contributed to inter-metastatic transcriptomic heterogeneity, but did not define subtype distinctions. The de novo liver metastasis subtype (LMS) framework recapitulated the main distinction between epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like tumors, with a strong immune and stromal component only in the latter. We also identified biologically distinct epithelial-like subtypes originating from different progenitor cell types. LMS1 metastases had several transcriptomic features of cancer aggressiveness, including secretory progenitor cell origin, oncogenic addictions, and microsatellite instability in a microsatellite stable background, as well as frequent RAS/TP53 co-mutations. The poor-prognostic association of LMS1 metastases was independent of mutation status, clinicopathological variables, and current subtyping frameworks (consensus molecular subtypes and colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes). LMS1 was also the least heterogeneous subtype in comparisons of multiple metastases per patient, and tumor heterogeneity did not confound the prognostic value of LMS1.

conclusionsWe report the first large study of multi-metastatic gene expression profiling of colorectal cancer. The new metastasis-oriented subtyping framework showed potential for clinically relevant transcriptomic classification in the context of metastatic heterogeneity, and an LMS1 mini-classifier was constructed to facilitate prognostic stratification and further clinical testing.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMicroarray AnalysisMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedColorectal cancerGene expression profilingGene set enrichment analysesLiver metastasisMetastatic heterogeneityPrediction modelsPrognostic factorTranscriptomic subtyping

Identifiers

PMID34470666
PMCPMC8411513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.