Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470644›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2021

Bacterial vaginosis: drivers of recurrence and challenges and opportunities in partner treatment.

Lenka A Vodstrcil, Christina A Muzny, Erica L Plummer, Jack D Sobel, Catriona S Bradshaw

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HIV Transmission and Immunology of the Male Reproductive Tract.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Regulatory Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. iScience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lenka A VodstrcilCentral Clinical School - Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Monash University, 580 Swanston St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia. lenka.vodstrcil@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3679-9195
Christina A MuznyDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Erica L PlummerCentral Clinical School - Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Monash University, 580 Swanston St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
Jack D SobelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Catriona S BradshawCentral Clinical School - Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Monash University, 580 Swanston St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Microbial Interactions between Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Atopobium Prior to Incident Bacterial VaginosisR01AI146065 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MUZNY, CHRISTINA A · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal dysbiosis to affect women globally, yet an unacceptably high proportion of women experience BV recurrence within 6 months of recommended antibiotic therapy. The low rate of sustained cure highlights our limited understanding of the pathogenesis of BV recurrence, which has been attributed to possible persistence and re-emergence of BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) or a BV-associated biofilm following antimicrobials and/or reinfection occurring from sexual partners.There is a robust body of evidence to support the exchange of bacteria between partners during sexual activity, and while the hypothesis that women treated for BV are subsequently reinfected with BVAB following sex with an untreated sexual partner is not new, failure of past partner treatment trials has eroded confidence in this concept. If reinfection is a key driver of recurrence, current antimicrobial regimens directed to women alone are unlikely to achieve a high level of sustained cure, and the approach of partner treatment to reduce reinfection is justified. In this manuscript, we present the molecular and epidemiological evidence that underlies the hypothesis that BV is sexually transmitted, and summarise why research that continues to consider sexual partnerships is necessary. We also outline the significant barriers and challenges that we have identified while undertaking partner treatment studies, and we discuss the factors that impact on our ability to determine their effectiveness.Ultimately, the pathogenesis of BV recurrence is likely to be multifaceted and not attributable to a single mechanism in all women. If we are to achieve sustained cure for women, it is likely that combined and individualised approaches to eradicate BVAB, support an optimal vaginal microbiome, and prevent reinfection from partners will be required.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaVaginosis, BacterialFemaleHumansRecurrenceSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersBacterial vaginosisClindamycinFemale partnersMale partnersMetronidazolePenile microbiotaSexually transmitted infectionTreatmentUrethral microbiotaVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID34470644
PMCPMC8411528
OpenAlexW3197967892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.