Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470612›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Potential utility of physical function measures to improve the risk prediction of functional disability in community-dwelling older Japanese adults: a prospective study.

Tao Chen, Takanori Honda, Sanmei Chen, Hiro Kishimoto, Shuzo Kumagai, Kenji Narazaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reference values for the PROMISBMC public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao ChenSport and Health Research Center, Department of Physical Education, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, 200092, Shanghai, China.
Takanori HondaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, 812-8582, Fukuoka, Japan.
Sanmei ChenDepartment of Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami Ward, 734-8553, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiro KishimotoFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku, 819-0395, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shuzo KumagaiInstitute of Convergence Bio-Health, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 beon-gil, Hadan-dong, Saha-gu, 49-315, Busan, South Korea.
Kenji NarazakiCenter for Liberal Arts, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, 3-30-1 Wajiro- higashi, Higashi-ku, 811-0295, Fukuoka, Japan. narazaki@fit.ac.jp.
Kyushu University · JPFukuoka Institute of Technology · JPHiroshima University · JPShiga Medical Center · JPTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile gait speed, one-leg standing balance, and handgrip strength have been shown to be independent predictors for functional disability, it is unclear whether such simple measures of physical function contribute to improved risk prediction of functional disability in older adults.

methodsA total of 1,591 adults aged ≥ 65 years and without functional disability at baseline were followed up for up to 7.9 years. Functional disability was identified using the database of Japan's Long-term Care Insurance System. Maximum gait speed, one-leg standing time, and handgrip strength were measured at baseline. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of physical function and functional disability incidence. The incremental predictive value of each physical function measure for risk prediction was quantified using the difference in overall C-statistic, category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index.

resultsDuring follow-up (median: 7.8 years), functional disability was identified in 384 participants. All of the physical function measures were inversely associated with the risk of functional disability, independent of potential confounding factors. The multivariable adjusted HRs (95 % CIs) for functional disability per one standard deviation increment of maximum gait speed, one-leg-standing time, and hand grip strength were 0.73 (0.65-0.83), 0.68 (0.59-0.79), and 0.72 (0.59-0.86), respectively. Incorporation of each of maximum gait speed, one-leg-stand time, and hand grip strength into a basic model with other risk factors significantly improved C-statistic from 0.770 (95 % CIs, 0.751-0.794) to 0.778 (0.759-0.803), 0.782 (0.760-0.805), and 0.775 (0.756-0.800), respectively (all p < 0.05). A model including all three measures had the highest C-statistic of 0.787 (0.765-0.810). The improvements in risk prediction were also confirmed by category-free NRI and IDI index.

conclusionsAdding any of the three measures to a basic model with other known risk factors significantly improved the prediction of functional disability and addition of all three measures provided further improvement of the prediction in older Japanese adults. These data provide robust evidence to support the practical utility of incorporating these simple physical function measures into functional disability risk prediction tools.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthIndependent LivingAgedHumansJapanProspective StudiesWalking SpeedFunctional limitationPhysical performancePredictive valueRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34470612
PMCPMC8411504
OpenAlexW3196959386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.