Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470508›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2021

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urological Care Delivery in the United States.

Daniel J Lee, Jeremy B Shelton, Paul Brendel, Rahul Doraiswami, Danil Makarov, William Meeks, Raymond Fang, Matthew T Roe, Matthew R Cooperberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Efficacy of Rezūm water vapor therapy for the treatment of catheter-dependent urinary retention A single-center, Canadian experience.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. The safety and efficacy of ambulatory urologic surgery A paradigm shift towards optimizing resource use in outpatient settings.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel J LeeDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeremy B SheltonDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Paul BrendelVerana Health, San Francisco, California.
Rahul DoraiswamiVerana Health, San Francisco, California.
Danil MakarovVA New York Harbor Healthcare System and Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
William MeeksAmerican Urological Association Education & Research, Department of Data Management & Statistical Analysis, Linthicum, Maryland.
Raymond FangAmerican Urological Association Education & Research, Department of Data Management & Statistical Analysis, Linthicum, Maryland.
Matthew T RoeVerana Health, San Francisco, California.
Matthew R CooperbergDepartments of Urology, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Learning Health Systems Mentored Career Development ProgramK12HS026372 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASCH, DAVID A, LANE-FALL, MEGHAN BROOKS · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined changes in urological care delivery due to COVID-19 in the U.S. based on patient, practice, and local/regional demographic and pandemic response features. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed real-world data from the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry collected from electronic health record systems. Data represented 157 outpatient urological practices and 3,165 providers across 48 U.S. states and territories, including 3,297,721 unique patients, 12,488,831 total outpatient visits and 2,194,456 procedures. The primary outcome measure was the number of outpatient visits and procedures performed (inpatient or outpatient) per practice per week, measured from January 2019 to February 2021.

resultsWe found large (>50%) declines in outpatient visits from March 2020 to April 2020 across patient demographic groups and states, regardless of timing of state stay-at-home orders. Nonurgent outpatient visits decreased more across various nonurgent procedures (49%-59%) than for procedures performed for potentially urgent diagnoses (38%-52%); surgical procedures for nonurgent conditions also decreased more (43%-79%) than those for potentially urgent conditions (43%-53%). African American patients had similar decreases in outpatient visits compared with Asians and Caucasians, but also slower recoveries back to baseline. Medicare-insured patients had the steepest declines (55%), while those on Medicaid and government insurance had the lowest percentage of recovery to baseline (73% and 69%, respectively).

conclusionsThis study provides real-world evidence on the decline in urological care across demographic groups and practice settings, and demonstrates a differential impact on the utilization of urological health services by demographics and procedure type.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'TelemedicineUnited StatesUrologic DiseasesCOVID-19healthcare disparitieshealth services researchsocioeconomic factorsurology

Identifiers

PMID34470508
PMCPMC8584199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.