Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34470088›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of parasitology2021

Human Taeniasis and Cysticercosis and Related Factors in Phu Tho Province, Northern Vietnam.

Vu Thi Lam Binh, Do Trung Dung, Hoang Quang Vinh, Van Hul Anke, Praet Nicolas, Dorny Pierre, Dermauw Veronique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vu Thi Lam BinhNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology (NIMPE), No 34 Trung Van, Nam Tu Liem, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Do Trung DungNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology (NIMPE), No 34 Trung Van, Nam Tu Liem, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Hoang Quang VinhNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology (NIMPE), No 34 Trung Van, Nam Tu Liem, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Van Hul AnkeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.
Praet NicolasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.
Dorny PierreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.
Dermauw VeroniqueDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

Directorate-General for Development Cooperation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several factors presumed to facilitate the transmission of Taenia spp. were reported in Vietnam. We conducted a cross-sectional study taking questionnaires from 1,185 participants, and collecting 1,151 sera and 1,036 stool samples in northern Vietnam. Sera were examined for circulating antigens of Taenia solium cysticerci using ELISA, stools for Taenia eggs by Kato-Katz smear, and copro-antigens by ELISA. Ag-ELISA revealed 4.6% antigen positivity, indicating infection with viable cysticerci. Taenia eggs were detected in 1.5% of participants. Copro-antigens were found in 2.8% of participants. Eating raw meat and/or vegetables was significantly associated with the presence of copro-antigen (OR=8.6, 95% CI: 1.16-63.9, P=0.01). Considering the high taeniasis prevalence and the associated threat, public health attention should be given to treat the tapeworm carriers in the projected areas.

Indexed as

CysticercosisTaeniasisTaenia soliumAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansVietnamcopro-antigencysticercosistaeniasisTaenia soliumTaenia spp.Vietnam

Identifiers

PMID34470088
PMCPMC8413854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.