ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2021
Deep learning enabled brain shunt valve identification using mobile phones.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-based detection of Certas Plus shunt valve settings in CT scans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fully automated detection and identification of CSF shunt valves using YOLOv8 and a class-based reference image assignment as a safety mechanism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applied deep learning in neurosurgery: identifying cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt systems in hydrocephalus patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAccurate information concerning implanted medical devices prior to a Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is crucial to assure safety of the patient and to address MRI induced unintended changes in device settings. The identification of these devices still remains a very challenging task. In this paper, with the aim of providing a faster device detection, we propose the adoption of deep learning for medical device detection from X-rays.
methodIn particular, we propose a pipeline for the identification of implanted programmable cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves using X-ray images of the radiologist workstation screens captured with mobile phone integrated cameras at different angles and illuminations. We compare the proposed convolutional neural network with published methods.
resultsExperimental results show that this approach outperforms methods trained on images digitally transferred directly from the scanners and then applied on mobile phones images (mean accuracy 95% vs 77%, Avg. Precision 0.96 vs 0.77, Avg. Recall 0.95 vs 0.77, Avg. F1-score 0.95 vs 0.77) and existing published methods based on transfer learning fine-tuned directly on the mobile phone images (mean accuracy 94% vs 75%, Avg. Precision 0.94 vs 0.75, Avg. Recall 0.94 vs 0.75, Avg. F1-score 0.94 vs 0.75).
conclusionAn automated shunt valve identification system is a promising safety tool for radiologists to efficiently coordinate the care of patients with implanted devices. An image-based safety system able to be deployed on a mobile phone would have significant advantages over methods requiring direct input from X-ray scanners or clinical picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in terms of ease of integration in the hospital or clinical ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.