Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34469692›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021

Lin_F9: A Linear Empirical Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Docking.

Chao Yang, Yingkai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao YangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-6013
Yingkai ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-3354

Funding

Computational modulator design and machine learning to target protein-protein interactionsR35GM127040 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Yingkai Zhang · 2018 to 2026
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular docking is one of the most widely used computational tools in structure-based drug design and is critically dependent on accuracy and robustness of the scoring function. In this work, we introduce a new scoring function Lin_F9, which is a linear combination of nine empirical terms, including a unified metal bond term to specifically describe metal-ligand interactions. Parameters in Lin_F9 are obtained with a multistage fitting protocol using explicit water-included structures. For the CASF-2016 benchmark test set, Lin_F9 achieves the top scoring power among all 34 classical scoring functions for both original crystal poses and locally optimized poses with Pearson correlation coefficients (

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationWaterLigandsProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID34469692
PMCPMC8478859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.