Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34469536›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

The Ancient Salicoid Genome Duplication Event: A Platform for Reconstruction of De Novo Gene Evolution in Populus trichocarpa.

Timothy B Yates, Kai Feng, Jin Zhang, Vasanth Singan, Sara S Jawdy, Priya Ranjan, Paul E Abraham, Kerrie Barry, Anna Lipzen, Chongle Pan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GAPDH Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Validation of a metabolite-GWAS network forFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy B YatesBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Kai FengBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Jin ZhangBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-5078
Vasanth SinganU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Sara S JawdyBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Priya RanjanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Paul E AbrahamBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Kerrie BarryU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Anna LipzenU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Chongle PanSchool of Computer Science and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Jeremy SchmutzU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-9172
Jin-Gui ChenBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Gerald A TuskanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Wellington MucheroBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orphan genes are characteristic genomic features that have no detectable homology to genes in any other species and represent an important attribute of genome evolution as sources of novel genetic functions. Here, we identified 445 genes specific to Populus trichocarpa. Of these, we performed deeper reconstruction of 13 orphan genes to provide evidence of de novo gene evolution. Populus and its sister genera Salix are particularly well suited for the study of orphan gene evolution because of the Salicoid whole-genome duplication event which resulted in highly syntenic sister chromosomal segments across the Salicaceae. We leveraged this genomic feature to reconstruct de novo gene evolution from intergenera, interspecies, and intragenomic perspectives by comparing the syntenic regions within the P. trichocarpa reference, then P. deltoides, and finally Salix purpurea. Furthermore, we demonstrated that 86.5% of the putative orphan genes had evidence of transcription. Additionally, we also utilized the Populus genome-wide association mapping panel, a collection of 1,084 undomesticated P. trichocarpa genotypes to further determine putative regulatory networks of orphan genes using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping. Functional enrichment of these eQTL subnetworks identified common biological themes associated with orphan genes such as response to stress and defense response. We also identify a putative cis-element for a de novo gene and leverage conserved synteny to describe evolution of a putative transcription factor binding site. Overall, 45% of orphan genes were captured in trans-eQTL networks.

Indexed as

PopulusEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyPhylogenyde novo gene evolutiongene regulationgenome evolutionorphan genessyntenywhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID34469536
PMCPMC8445398
OpenAlexW3197293688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.