Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34469452›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Findings from the Kids in Communities Study (KiCS): A mixed methods study examining community-level influences on early childhood development.

Sharon Goldfeld, Karen Villanueva, Robert Tanton, Ilan Katz, Sally Brinkman, Billie Giles-Corti, Geoffrey Woolcock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sharon GoldfeldCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6520-7094
Karen VillanuevaPolicy, Equity and Translation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert TantonNational Centre for Social and Economic Modelling, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Ilan KatzSocial Policy Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sally BrinkmanFraser Mustard Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-4844
Billie Giles-CortiCentre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Geoffrey WoolcockInstitute for Resilient Regions, The University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing international interest in place-based approaches to improve early childhood development (ECD) outcomes. The available data and evidence are limited and precludes well informed policy and practice change. Developing the evidence-base for community-level effects on ECD is one way to facilitate more informed and targeted community action. This paper presents overall final findings from the Kids in Communities Study (KiCS), an Australian mixed methods investigation into community-level effects on ECD in five domains of influence-physical, social, governance, service, and sociodemographic. Twenty five local communities (suburbs) across Australia were selected based on 'diagonality type' i.e. whether they performed better (off-diagonal positive), worse (off-diagonal negative), or 'as expected' (on-diagonal) on the Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) relative to their socioeconomic profile. The approach was designed to determine replicable and modifiable factors that were separate to socioeconomic status. Between 2015-2017, stakeholder interviews (n = 146), parent and service provider focus groups (n = 51), and existing socio-economic and early childhood education and care administrative data were collected. Qualitative and quantitative data analyses were undertaken to understand differences between 14 paired disadvantaged local communities (i.e. on versus off-diagonal). Further analysis of qualitative data elicited important factors for all 25 local communities. From this, we developed a draft set of 'Foundational Community Factors' (FCFs); these are the factors that lay the foundations of a good community for young children.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCommunity ParticipationStakeholder ParticipationAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleParentsPolicyQualitative ResearchSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID34469452
PMCPMC8409665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.