Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34469360›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners2022

Describing cognitive function and psychosocial outcomes of COVID-19 survivors: A cross-sectional analysis.

Ashley M Henneghan, Kimberly A Lewis, Eliana Gill, Oscar Y Franco-Rocha, Ruben D Vela, Sarah Medick, Shelli R Kesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neurological, psychological, psychosocial complications of long-COVID and their management.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neurological involvement associated with COVID-19 disease: a study on psychosocial factors.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley M HenneghanSchool of Nursing, Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Kimberly A LewisDepartment of Nursing Research, Ascension Texas, Austin, Texas.
Eliana GillSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Oscar Y Franco-RochaSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Ruben D VelaDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Sarah MedickSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Shelli R KeslerSchool of Nursing, Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility CoreP30NR015335 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HORNER, SHARON D · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Precision Health Intervention Methodology Training in Self-Management of Multiple Chronic ConditionsT32NR019035 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI STUIFBERGEN, ALEXA · 2020 to 2024
$995k
Brain Connectivity and Self-Reported Cancer Related Cognitive ImpairmentK01NR018970 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HENNEGHAN, ASHLEY M. · 2020 to 2022
$312k
NINR NIH HHS K01 NR018970NINR NIH HHS P30 NR015335NINR NIH HHS T32 NR019035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological and psychological symptoms are increasingly realized in the post-acute phase of COVID-19. PURPOSE: To examine and characterize cognitive and related psychosocial symptoms in adults (21-75 years) who tested positive for or were treated as positive for COVID-19.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, data collection included a cognitive testing battery (Trails B; Digit Symbol; Stroop; Immediate and Delayed Verbal Learning) and surveys (demographic/clinical history; self-reported cognitive functioning depressive symptoms, fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance, social role performance, and stress). Results were compared with published norms, rates of deficits (more than 1 standard deviation (SD) from the norm) were described, and correlations were explored.

resultsWe enrolled 52 participants (mean age 37.33 years; 78.85% female) who were, on average, 4 months post illness. The majority had a history of mild or moderate COVID-19 severity. Forty percent of participants demonstrated scores that were 1 SD or more below the population norm on one or more of the cognitive tests. A subset had greater anxiety (21.15%), depressive symptoms (23.07%), and sleep disturbance (19.23%) than population norms. Age differences were identified in Stroop, Digit Symbol, and Trails B scores by quartile ( p < .01), with worse performance in those 28-33 years old.

conclusionsCognitive dysfunction and psychological symptoms may be present in the weeks or months after COVID-19 diagnosis, even in those with mild to moderate illness severity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinicians need to be aware and educate patients about the potential late/long-term cognitive and psychological effects of COVID-19, even in mild to moderate disease.

Identifiers

PMID34469360
PMCPMC8882196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.