Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34469329›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2021

Linking temporal-parietal junction to internet addiction tendency: Moderating effect of critical thinking.

Di Liu, Yuhe Ma, Kaixiang Zhuang, Qunlin Chen, Baoguo Shi, Jiang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Di Liu1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.
Yuhe Ma1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.
Kaixiang Zhuang2 Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Qunlin Chen2 Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Baoguo Shi1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3577-3890
Jiang Qiu2 Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND

aimsInternet addiction (IA) is a common internet-related addictive behavior. An enormous amount of previous research on IA disorders (IADs) have paid attention to the neural basis of abnormalities, while few studies have elucidated the neural distinctions of IA tendency in general population.

methodsThe current study examined the neural basis of IA tendency combining with voxel-based morphometry (VBM) from the average student body (N = 244).

resultsAs the results presented, the gray matter density (GMD) of the left temporal-parietal junction (TPJ) was positively correlated with Internet Addiction Test (IAT) score. Further analysis revealed that critical thinking moderated the path between GMD in the TPJ and IA tendency. Specifically, the correlation between GMD in the TPJ and IA tendency was weaker for those with a higher critical thinking disposition. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionHigher critical thinking show a hindering effect in susceptibility to IA based on the neural basis of temporal-parietal junction differences.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveInternet Addiction DisorderGray MatterHumansInternetStudentsThinkingcritical thinkingGMDinternet addiction tendencymoderating effectTPJ

Identifiers

PMID34469329
PMCPMC8997234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.