ReviewJCO oncology practice2022
Predictive Modeling for Adverse Events and Risk Stratification Programs for People Receiving Cancer Treatment.
Review in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Model of Severe Fatigue After Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Toward a Personalized Framework in Survivorship Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Trial
- Understanding drivers of emergency department visits among patients from populations disproportionately affected by acute care use during cancer treatment: insights from qualitative interviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Acute Care Events During Systemic Cancer Treatment: Moving From Risk Prediction to Clinical Decision Support Using a Two-Model Approach.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Embracing the Digital Revolution: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Clinical Trials in Older Participants.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Occupational skin health risk among nurses: development and validation of a nomogram-based prediction model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinical risk model for postoperative outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Risk Prediction Model Development to Support Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Predictive model for the risk of cytokine release syndrome with glofitamab treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Predicting the Future by Studying the Past for Patients With Cancer Diagnosed in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Predicting Acute Care Events Among Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: A Practice-Based Validation and Adaptation of the PROACCT Model.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Data Science Implementation Trends in Nursing Practice: A Review of the 2021 Literature.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Review
- Comparison of Oncologist and Model Estimates of Risk for Hospitalization During Systemic Therapy for Advanced Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Cardiotoxicity among socioeconomically marginalized breast cancer patients.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm Predicting Emergency Department Use and Unplanned Hospitalization in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2022Article
- From Risk Prediction to Delivery Innovation: Envisioning the Path to Personalized Cancer Care Delivery.JCO oncology practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency department visits and hospitalizations are common among people receiving cancer treatment, accounting for a large proportion of spending in oncology care and negatively affecting quality of life. As oncology care shifts toward value- and quality-based payment models, there is a need to develop interventions that can prevent these costly and low-value events among people receiving cancer treatment. Risk stratification programs have the potential to address this need and optimally would consist of three components: (1) a risk stratification algorithm that accurately identifies patients with modifiable risk(s), (2) intervention(s) that successfully reduce this risk, and (3) the ability to implement the risk algorithm and intervention(s) in an adaptable and sustainable way. Predictive modeling is a common method of risk stratification, and although a number of predictive models have been developed for use in oncology care, they have rarely been tested alongside corresponding interventions or developed with implementation in clinical practice as an explicit consideration. In this article, we review the available published predictive models for treatment-related toxicity or acute care events among people receiving cancer treatment and highlight challenges faced when attempting to use these models in practice. To move the field of risk-stratified oncology care forward, we argue that it is critical to evaluate predictive models alongside targeted interventions that address modifiable risks and to demonstrate that these two key components can be implemented within clinical practice to avoid unplanned acute care events among people receiving cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.