Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468966›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2022

Budget Impact of the Vest™ High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation System for Managing Airway Clearance in Patients with Complex Neurological Disorders: A US Healthcare Payers' Perspective Analysis.

Amir Ansaripour, Kari Roehrich, Atefeh Mashayekhi, Mwanamisi Wanjala, Shani Noel, Mohsen Rezaei Hemami, Angela Murray, Mehdi Javanbakht

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Physiology-Guided Selection of Hardware-Assisted Airway Clearance Techniques during Acute Exacerbations of Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir AnsaripourOptimax Access, Gustav Mahlerplein 2, 1082 MA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. amir.ansaripour@optimaxaccess.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-6393
Kari RoehrichHillrom, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Atefeh MashayekhiOptimax Access, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, Hampshire, UK.
Mwanamisi WanjalaHillrom, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Shani NoelHillrom, Laurel, MD, USA.
Mohsen Rezaei HemamiUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Angela MurrayHillrom, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mehdi JavanbakhtOptimax Access, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, Hampshire, UK.
Hillrom (United States) · USUniversity of Southampton · GBOptimax (United States) · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs a recognized therapy to improve airway clearance, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is used to manage reduced vital capacity in patients with complex neuromuscular disorders (cNMD). This study aimed to investigate the budget impact of HFCWO versus chest wall physical therapy (CWPT) from a US-commercial payer perspective.

methodsIn combination with a previously developed cost-effectiveness model, a budget impact model was developed to evaluate the incremental budgetary impact associated with introducing a HFCWO device over a 5-year time horizon. The model compared the cost implications associated with the commonly used CWPT procedure, as the current scenario, with a new scenario consisting of 80% of market share for HFCWO. The resource use and costs included in the analyses were costs associated with the HFCWO device (Vest™ System) and its consumables, patient training, and medical services such as hospitalization, medications, emergency room, and outpatient visits. The primary outcome measures included total and incremental budgetary impact per member per year (PMPY).

resultsIn a hypothetical plan of 1,000,000 members (men: 49.2%), 2099 patients with cNMD were estimated to be eligible to receive airway clearance services over 5 years. The new scenario (HFCWO and CWPT [US$24 PMPY]) was cost-saving compared with the current scenario (CWPT only [$34 PMPY]) with a cost reduction of US$9.46 PMPY. The model estimated a net cost-saving of US$1,594,131 and US$9,591,343 over 1 and 5 years, respectively.

conclusionThis study suggests the HFCWO technique to manage the reduction in vital capacity in patients with cNMD would lead to favorable budget impact results.

Identifiers

PMID34468966
PMCPMC8864050
OpenAlexW3197700172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.