Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468901›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2022

The Ca

Monika Heyer, Sandra S Scholz, Michael Reichelt, Grit Kunert, Ralf Oelmüller, Axel Mithöfer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inter-Organellar CaCells · 2025
    Review
  6. Principles of signal integration in combinatorial stress acclimatization.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptome Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. A MaizeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Positive roles of the CaMolecular plant pathology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Calcium Signaling in Plant-Insect Interactions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Molecular biology of chemical defenses.Plant molecular biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika HeyerResearch Group Plant Defense Physiology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Sandra S ScholzDepartment for Plant Physiology, Matthias Schleiden Institute, Friedrich Schiller University, Dornburger Straße 159, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Michael ReicheltDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Grit KunertDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Ralf OelmüllerDepartment for Plant Physiology, Matthias Schleiden Institute, Friedrich Schiller University, Dornburger Straße 159, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Axel MithöferResearch Group Plant Defense Physiology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745, Jena, Germany. amithoefer@ice.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-6913
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC1127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageCalmodulin-like-proteins (CML) belong to a family of calcium-sensing proteins that are unique for plants and involved in many different developmental and stress-related reactions. In defense against herbivory, some pathogens and drought, CML37 acts as a positive and CML42 as a negative regulator, respectively. We provide evidence that both CMLs act antagonistically in the regulation of induced defense responses. A double knock-out line, cml37 x cml42, thus shows wild-type phenotypes upon all kind of stresses we used. A transient increase in the cytosolic calcium concentration is one of the first reactions that can be measured in plant cells upon abiotic as well as biotic stress treatments. These calcium signals are sensed by calcium binding proteins such as calmodulin-like proteins (CMLs), which transduce the sensed information into appropriate stress responses by interacting with downstream target proteins. In previous studies, CML37 has been shown to positively regulate the plants' defense against both the insect herbivore Spodoptera littoralis and the response to drought stress. In contrast, CML42 is known to negatively regulate those two stress responses. Here, we provide evidence that these two CMLs act antagonistically in the regulation of induced responses directed against drought and herbivory stress as well as in the defense against the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. Both CMLs shape the plant reactions by altering the phytohormone signaling. Consequently, the phytohormone-regulated production of defensive compounds like glucosinolates is also antagonistically mediated by both CMLs. The finding that CML37 and CML42 have antagonistic roles in diverse stress-related responses suggests that these calcium sensor proteins represent important tools for the plant to balance and fine-tune the signaling and downstream reactions upon environmental stress.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumCalmodulinGene Expression Regulation, PlantHerbivoryPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumCalmodulinPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsAbscisic acidAlternaria brassicicolaCalciumDefenseDroughtGlucosinolatesHerbivoryJasmonatesNecrotrophic pathogenesSpodoptera littoralis

Identifiers

PMID34468901
PMCPMC9213386
OpenAlexW3196859819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.