Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
Clinical management and outcomes associated with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus mitotane treatment in metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: a single institute experience.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Driven Identification and In Vitro Validation of the APOBEC3B-ANLN Regulatory Axis in Adrenocortical Carcinoma.Endocrine · 2026Article
- Oncological Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Update and Critical Review.Oncology and therapy · 2025Review
- Prognostic Factors Among Patients with Non-metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- EDP-M plus sintilimab in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: a case report.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Persistent Properties of a Subpopulation of Cancer Cells Overexpressing the Hedgehog Receptor Patched.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive disease that is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. There is no standard treatment for metastatic ACC; EDP-M (etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus mitotane) is one treatment option. A randomized controlled trial (FIRM-ACT) evaluating the efficacy of EDP-M showed progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months, overall survival (OS) was 14.8 months, the response rate was 19%, and adrenal insufficiency occurred in 3.4% of patients. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in Asia are not fully reported.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 43 patients diagnosed with metastatic ACC at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1997 and 2020. We evaluated PFS, OS, and response in 17 patients who received EDP-M as first-line therapy.
resultsThe median age at treatment initiation was 45 years (range 18-74). Eight patients (47%) had autonomous hormone production, including six patients with hypercortisolism. The best response of partial response and stable disease was seen in two (12%) and ten (59%) patients, respectively. The median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3-10.0]. The median OS was 15.4 months (95% CI 11.6-not reached). Three patients received only one cycle due to adverse effects associated with hypercortisolism. Grade 3/4 adverse events associated with adrenal insufficiency occurred in three (17%) cases, resulting in EDP-M discontinuation.
conclusionsThe EDP-M regimen had similar PFS to that observed in FIRM-ACT. Adrenal insufficiency was more frequent in the current study, but this could be managed with supportive endocrinological care such as cortisol replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.