ArticleAnimal cognition2022
Recovery-from-extinction effects in an anuran amphibian: renewal effect, but no reinstatement.
Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Context specificity of latent inhibition in the snail Cornu aspersum.Animal cognition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery-from-extinction effects in which a conditioned response returns after extinction have been shown in mammals, birds and fish. Thus, these effects appear to be conserved among vertebrates; however, they have yet to be investigated in amphibians. Using prey catching conditioning in the fire-bellied toad (Bombina orientalis), we tested if renewal and reinstatement occurred after extinction when subjects were respectively re-exposed to the context or reinforcer used during conditioning. For renewal, a different context was used during extinction and thus renewal tests assessed if external contextual cues associated during conditioning stimulated prey catching performance. For reinstatement, the reinforcer withheld during extinction was simply delivered again prior to a test assessing if internal cues associated with recent prey consumption stimulated prey catching performance. Conditioning followed a fixed ratio 5 schedule of reinforcement, where five attempts to capture a cricket stimulus displayed on a computer screen were reinforced by delivery of a single live cricket. Performance was measured as the time to reach five prey catching attempts. A significant improvement in prey catching performance during conditioning followed by deterioration with extinction was seen in the experiments. Upon return to the context used for conditioning after extinction, toads showed a renewal effect whereby they displayed faster performance during testing compared to the end of extinction. Conversely, toads showed no reinstatement effect because pre-feeding of a cricket did not influence performance during the test that followed extinction. Reinstatement could have been lost in amphibian phylogeny due to secondary simplification of the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.