Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468858›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Quantitative assessment of the habitat quality dynamics in Yellow River Basin, China.

Yanan Song, Meng Wang, Xiaofang Sun, Zemeng Fan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Impact of Land Use Change on the Habitat Quality Evolution in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Trade-Off Analyses of Multiple Ecosystem Services and Their Drivers in the Shandong Yellow River Basin.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanan SongSchool of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826, China.
Meng WangSchool of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826, China.
Xiaofang SunSchool of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826, China. sunxf@qfnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-0814
Zemeng FanState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

Funding

the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education in China 20YJCZH140The National Natural Science Foundations of China 42071373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat quality is an important indicator for measuring regional biodiversity and ecosystem service value. A change in habitat quality is the direct result of the interaction between human activities and the natural environment. In this study, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate the habitat quality of the Yellow River Basin (YRB) from 1980 to 2018. We further analyzed the quantity and spatial transfer status of habitat quality quantitatively using the Geo-informatic Tupu method. The results show that the habitat degradation degree under human disturbance showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, with values of 0.0196 in 1980, 0.0200 in 2000, and 0.0199 in 2018. In addition, it presents two ring structures: light-severe-high-moderate and light-moderate-high-severe in space. The overall level of habitat quality in the basin is relatively good, but there is a trend of decline, which are 0.6091, 0.6069, and 0.6049 in the three stages respectively. The spatial distribution of habitat quality showed a pattern of high in the middle and low on both sides. The habitat quality has been restored in some areas. The transition between good and medium and good and excellent in the Tupu change units of the habitat quality grade is the most intense. Both stages are mainly the transformation from high-grade to low-grade habitat quality, but there is a trend of gradual improvement. The findings could have theoretical support and policy implications for the maintenance of biodiversity and the protection of the natural environment in the Yellow River Basin.

Indexed as

EcosystemRiversChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansGeo-information Tupu methodHabitat quality gradeInVEST modelLand coverSpatiotemporal dynamics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.