ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2021
[Minimally invasive lumbopelvic stabilization of sacral fracture and sacroiliac injury].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-Current Understanding and Open Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Lumbosacral Fixation in Patients with Suicidal Jumper's Fractures: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in Turkey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- [Clinical study of percutaneous double-segment lengthened sacroiliac screws internal fixation via three-dimensional navigation technology in treatment of Denis type Ⅱ and Ⅲ sacral fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRapid mobilization with full weight bearing by minimally invasive fixation of Os ilium to L5 in fractures of the sacrum and disruption of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). INDICATIONS: Unstable injuries of the posterior pelvic ring in fractures of the sacrum and disruption of the SIJ. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Fracture of ilium and not injury related implants in the screw trajectory, neurological deficits regarding the fracture, decubitus in the area of surgical approach. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Minimally invasive screw placement in the pedicles of L5, access of ilium screw via the posterior superior iliac spine. Radiological display for the iliacal screw bearing trajectory in Os Ilium as a drop-shaped/triangle canal. Insert a Jamshidi needle orthograde in the beam path, change to guide wire and placement of iliacal screw after resection of the bone in the screw head area. Submuscular insertion of the longitudinal rods, in case of double-sided instrumentation similar procedure on the opposite side, reduction of the fracture and fixation of the rods to screws. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperative mobilization with full weight bearing under physiotherapeutic guidance.
resultsPatients treated with lumbopelvic stabilization in our facility between 2012 and 2017 were identified via the hospital database and retrospectively evaluated. In 24 patients with median age of 60.1 years and a follow-up-time of 11.8 months, we found no implant displacement, infection and no wound healing problems. Full weight bearing was permitted in 21 of 24 cases, in 3 cases partial load bearing due to other injuries. Three patients reported moderate mechanical irritation of iliacal screws; 1 patient reported severe irritability with removal of the implants after bony healing of fracture 1 year postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.