Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468329›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Primary Care Psychiatry eConsults at a Rural Academic Medical Center: Descriptive Analysis.

Jade Avery, Dennis Dwan, Gillian Sowden, Matthew Duncan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jade Avery *Department of Psychiatry, New York Presbyterian, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-3403
Dennis Dwan *Carney Hospital, Dorchester, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5450-5766
Gillian SowdenDepartment of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8032-1872
Matthew DuncanDepartment of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-6617
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USCarney Hospital · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers serve a crucial role in addressing the mental health needs of many patients. However, there are times when input from a psychiatric specialist may be helpful in supporting the mental health care provided in primary care. Psychiatry eConsults can serve as a valuable tool in providing specialist advice for primary care physicians when direct referral to specialty care is not readily available.

objectiveThe goal of this study is to evaluate the content and implementation of psychiatric eConsults by primary care providers in a rural academic medical center.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of 343 eConsults placed between May 2016 and February 2019 by primary care providers at a single academic medical center. The content of eConsult requests, including patient diagnosis, consult question type, specialist recommendations, patient demographics, the distance of patient and primary care providers from the consulting provider, rate of implementation of the recommendation, and response time, were analyzed.

resultsThe most common diagnoses associated with eConsults were depression (162/450, 36%) and anxiety (118/450, 26%). The most commonly asked eConsult question was regarding medication management, including medication choice, side effects, interactions, and medication taper (288/343, 84%). More than one recommendation was included in 76% (259/343) of eConsults, and at least one recommendation was implemented by the primary care provider in 94% (282/300) of eConsults. The average time to respond to an eConsult was 26 hours.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that psychiatry eConsults can be conducted in a timely manner and that primary care providers implement the recommendations at a high rate.

Indexed as

PsychiatryRemote ConsultationAcademic Medical CentersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudieseConsultelectronic consultationpsychiatryruraltelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34468329
PMCPMC8444033
OpenAlexW3196441794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.