Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468322›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

An Early Warning Risk Prediction Tool (RECAP-V1) for Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: Protocol for a Statistical Analysis Plan.

Francesca Fiorentino, Denys Prociuk, Ana Belen Espinosa Gonzalez, Ana Luisa Neves, Laiba Husain, Sonny Christian Ramtale, Emma Mi, Ella Mi, Jack Macartney, Sneha N Anand and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04435041 (Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04435041 completednot on this map

Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Addressing the Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-level Challenges of a Radical New Service Model

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2020 to 2022Enrolled103ConditionsCOVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca FiorentinoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-6634
Denys ProciukDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-1933
Ana Belen Espinosa GonzalezDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-416X
Ana Luisa NevesPatient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-7211
Laiba HusainNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-0889
Sonny Christian RamtaleDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-1639
Emma MiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-5495
Ella MiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-7956
Jack MacartneyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-2659
Sneha N AnandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0538-3974
Julian SherlockNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-1936
Kavitha SaravanakumarWhole Systems Integrated Care, North West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-4062
Erik MayerDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-4580
Simon de LusignanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-2641
Trisha GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-8088
Brendan C DelaneyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-0131
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts have been made to develop early warning risk scores to help clinicians decide which patient is likely to deteriorate and require hospitalization. The RECAP (Remote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care) study investigates the predictive risk of hospitalization, deterioration, and death of patients with confirmed COVID-19, based on a set of parameters chosen through a Delphi process performed by clinicians. We aim to use rich data collected remotely through the use of electronic data templates integrated in the electronic health systems of several general practices across the United Kingdom to construct accurate predictive models. The models will be based on preexisting conditions and monitoring data of a patient's clinical parameters (eg, blood oxygen saturation) to make reliable predictions as to the patient's risk of hospital admission, deterioration, and death.

objectiveThis statistical analysis plan outlines the statistical methods to build the prediction model to be used in the prioritization of patients in the primary care setting. The statistical analysis plan for the RECAP study includes the development and validation of the RECAP-V1 prediction model as a primary outcome. This prediction model will be adapted as a three-category risk score split into red (high risk), amber (medium risk), and green (low risk) for any patient with suspected COVID-19. The model will predict the risk of deterioration and hospitalization.

methodsAfter the data have been collected, we will assess the degree of missingness and use a combination of traditional data imputation using multiple imputation by chained equations, as well as more novel machine-learning approaches to impute the missing data for the final analysis. For predictive model development, we will use multiple logistic regression analyses to construct the model. We aim to recruit a minimum of 1317 patients for model development and validation. We will then externally validate the model on an independent dataset of 1400 patients. The model will also be applied for multiple different datasets to assess both its performance in different patient groups and its applicability for different methods of data collection.

resultsAs of May 10, 2021, we have recruited 3732 patients. A further 2088 patients have been recruited through the National Health Service Clinical Assessment Service, and approximately 5000 patients have been recruited through the DoctalyHealth platform.

conclusionsThe methodology for the development of the RECAP-V1 prediction model as well as the risk score will provide clinicians with a statistically robust tool to help prioritize COVID-19 patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04435041; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04435041. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30083.

Indexed as

COVID-19early warningmodelingremote assessmentrisk score

Identifiers

PMID34468322
PMCPMC8494068
OpenAlexW3196676340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.