Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468284›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2021

Personal Interventions for Reducing Exposure and Risk for Outdoor Air Pollution: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Robert J Laumbach, Kevin R Cromar, Gary Adamkiewicz, Christopher Carlsten, Denis Charpin, Wanyu R Chan, Audrey de Nazelle, Francesco Forastiere, Jeffrey Goldstein, Sophie Gumy and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Air pollution and alveolar health.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk communication, respiratory health risks, and air pollution forecasting in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in multiple microenvironments among adolescents.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cardiopulmonary Health Burden of Wildfire Particulate Exposure Urges Us to Consider Interventions.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Robert J LaumbachORCID 0000-0002-4350-3674
Christopher CarlstenORCID 0000-0003-2455-6575
Denis Charpin
Audrey de NazelleORCID 0000-0002-1092-3971
Francesco Forastiere
Jeffrey Goldstein
William K HallmanORCID 0000-0002-4524-9876
Barbara J PolivkaORCID 0000-0002-6415-0580
Don D Sin
Giovanni Viegi
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre for Policy Studies · INHarvard University Press · USImperial College London · GBLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USLung Foundation Netherlands · NLNational Research Council · ITNew York University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Utah · USWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor air quality affects the health and wellbeing of large populations around the globe. Although source controls are the most effective approaches for improving air quality and reducing health risks, individuals can also take actions to reduce their personal exposure by staying indoors, reducing physical activity, altering modes of transportation, filtering indoor air, and using respirators and other types of face masks. A synthesis of available evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and potential adverse effects or unintended consequences of personal interventions for air pollution is needed by clinicians to assist patients and the public in making informed decisions about use of these interventions. To address this need, the American Thoracic Society convened a workshop in May of 2018 to bring together a multidisciplinary group of international experts to review the current state of knowledge about personal interventions for air pollution and important considerations when helping patients and the general public to make decisions about how best to protect themselves. From these discussions, recommendations were made regarding when, where, how, and for whom to consider personal interventions. In addition to the efficacy and safety of the various interventions, the committee considered evidence regarding the identification of patients at greatest risk, the reliability of air quality indices, the communication challenges, and the ethical and equity considerations that arise when discussing personal interventions to reduce exposure and risk from outdoor air pollution.

Indexed as

Air PollutionHumansReproducibility of ResultsTransportationUnited Statesair filtrationair pollutionexposurepersonal interventionrespirators

Identifiers

PMID34468284
PMCPMC8489863
OpenAlexW3197907743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.