Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468180›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2021

Changes in Latina Women's Exposure to Cleaning Chemicals Associated with Switching from Conventional to "Green" Household Cleaning Products: The LUCIR Intervention Study.

Kim G Harley, Lucia Calderon, James E S Nolan, Randy Maddalena, Marion Russell, Katherine Roman, Stephanie Mayo-Burgos, Jessica Cabrera, Norma Morga, Asa Bradman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dietary and social predictors of PFAS exposure in Hispanic children from Northern Virginia.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kim G HarleyCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Lucia CalderonCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
James E S NolanCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Randy MaddalenaLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Marion RussellLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Katherine RomanCHAMACOS Youth Council, Salinas, California, USA.
Stephanie Mayo-BurgosCHAMACOS Youth Council, Salinas, California, USA.
Jessica CabreraCHAMACOS Youth Council, Salinas, California, USA.
Norma MorgaClinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas, Salinas, California, USA.
Asa BradmanCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Center for Environmental Health · USHostos Community College · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USClinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousehold cleaning products may be a significant source of chemical exposures, including carcinogens and suspected endocrine disruptors.

objectivesWe characterized exposures during routine household cleaning and tested an intervention to reduce exposures to cleaning product chemicals.

methodsThe Lifting Up Communities with Interventions and Research (LUCIR) Study is a youth-led, community-based intervention project. Youth researchers conducted personal air monitoring with 50 Latina women while they cleaned their homes with their regular cleaning products (preintervention visit) and then 1 week later while they used "green" cleaning products provided by the study (postintervention visit). Air samples were analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organic compounds using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. We compared pre- and postintervention air concentrations of 47 chemicals of concern, selected because they were on California's Proposition 65 list of carcinogens or reproductive/developmental toxicants or were suspected endocrine disruptors. Youth researchers were integrally involved in the study design, data collection, interpretation, and dissemination of findings.

resultsWe observed statistically significant decreases in air concentrations of 17 chemicals of concern when participants switched to green cleaning products, including decreases in geometric mean concentrations of 1,4-dioxane ( DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that choosing cleaning products that are marketed as green may reduce exposure to several carcinogens and endocrine disruptors. Future studies should determine whether use of unscented green products would further reduce exposure to terpenes and musks. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8831.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsHazardous SubstancesAdolescentFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHispanic or LatinoHumansOrganic ChemicalsEndocrine DisruptorsHazardous SubstancesOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID34468180
PMCPMC8409434
OpenAlexW3198158518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.