Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468140›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2021

Management of Asbestos Containing Materials: A Detailed LCA Comparison of Different Scenarios Comprising First Time Asbestos Characterization Factor Proposal.

Martina Pini, Simone Scarpellini, Roberto Rosa, Paolo Neri, Alessandro F Gualtieri, Anna Maria Ferrari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Asbestos Poverty as a New Paradigm for Multidimensional Urban Sustainability.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Innovative Bioplasticizers from ResidualACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martina PiniDepartment of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Simone ScarpelliniDepartment of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Roberto RosaDepartment of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1863-1631
Paolo NeriDepartment of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Alessandro F GualtieriDepartment of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 103, 41125, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-9603
Anna Maria FerrariDepartment of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work addresses the complex issue of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) management, by focusing on the scenario of six municipalities comprised in the Reggio Emilia province of Emilia Romagna Italian region. Particularly, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was applied in order to assess in a quantitative and reliable manner the human toxicity as well as the ecotoxicity impacts associated with all of the different phases of ACMs management. The latter comprises mapping of ACMs, creation of a risk map for defining priority of intervention, encapsulation and removal of ACMs, as well as the as obtained asbestos containing waste (ACW) end of life. Particularly, a thermal inertisation treatment performed in a continuous industrial furnace was considered as the innovative end of life scenario to be compared with what actually was provided by the legislation of many countries worldwide, that is, the disposal of ACW in a controlled landfill for hazardous wastes. A characterization factor for asbestos fibers released both in outdoor air and in occupational setting was proposed for the first time and included in the USEtox 2.0 impact assessment method. This allowed us to reliably and quantitatively highlight that inertisation treatments should be the preferred solutions to be adopted by local and national authorities, especially if the obtained inert material finds application as secondary raw materials, thus contributing to a decrease in the environmental damage (limited to its toxicological contributions) to be associated with asbestos management.

Indexed as

AsbestosRefuse DisposalWaste ManagementHazardous WasteHumansIndustryItalyAsbestosHazardous Wasteasbestos containing wasteenvironmental sustainabilitylandfillinglife cycle assessmentthermal inertisation

Identifiers

PMID34468140
PMCPMC8459455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.