Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34468089›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of endoscopic surgery2022

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management of Acute Cholecystitis and Assessment of the Crisis Approach: A Multicenter Experience in Egypt.

Mina M B Fouad, Samuel S S Rezk, Arsany T Saber, Ahmed Khalifa, Peter Ibraheim, Sandy M N Ibraheim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How did the general surgeons intend to treat acute calculous cholecystitis during COVID-19 era?Results of online survey.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mina M B FouadCairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-190X
Samuel S S RezkCairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Arsany T SaberCairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed KhalifaCairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Peter IbraheimBanha University, Banha, Egypt.
Sandy M N IbraheimCairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-2110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe covid-19 pandemic has had a drastic impact on all medical services. Acute cholecystitis is a serious condition that accounts for a considerable percentage of general surgical acute admissions. Therefore, the Royal College of Surgeons' Commissioning guidance' recommended urgent admission to secondary care and early cholecystectomy. During the first wave of hospital admissions associated with COVID-19, most guidelines recommended conservative treatment in order to limit the admission rates and free up spaces for COVID-19-infected patients. However, reviews of this approach have not been widely done to assess the results and, in turn, planning our future management approach when future pressures on in-patient admissions are inevitable.

methodsOur study included all acute cholecystitis patients who needed surgical intervention in one Centre in the UK over three distinct periods (pre-COVID-19, during the first lockdown, and lockdown ease). Comparison between these groups were done regarding intraoperative and postoperative results.

resultsThe conservative management led to a high rate of readmission. Moreover, delayed cholecystectomy was associated with increased operative difficulties such as extensive adhesions, intraoperative blood loss, and/or complicated gall bladder pathologies such as perforated or gangrenous gall bladder (29.9%, 16.7%, and 24.8%, respectively). The resulting postoperative complications of surgical and nonsurgical resulted in a longer hospital stay (13.5 d).

conclusionThe crisis approach for acute cholecystitis management failed to deliver the hoped outcome. Instead, it backfired and did the exact opposite, leading to longer hospital stays and extra burden to the patient and the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEgyptHumansLength of StayPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcomeacute cholecystitisCOVID-19crisis approach

Identifiers

PMID34468089
PMCPMC8652686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.