Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467806›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2022

Breast Cancer Treatment Following Health Reform: Evidence From Massachusetts.

Lindsay M Sabik, Kirsten Y Eom, Bassam Dahman, Jie Li, G J van Londen, Cathy J Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsay M SabikUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-4929
Kirsten Y EomUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bassam DahmanVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jie LiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
G J van LondenUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cathy J BradleyUniversity of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
EPA EP-D-16-017NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are well-documented differences in breast cancer treatment by insurance status. Insurance expansions provide a context to assess the relationship between insurance and patterns of breast cancer care. We examine the association of Massachusetts health reform with use of breast conserving surgery, reconstruction, and adjuvant radiation using data from the Massachusetts Cancer Registry and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registries for 2001-2013 and a difference-in-differences approach. We observe statistically significant increases in breast conserving surgery among nonelderly women in Massachusetts relative to trends in states and age groups not affected by health reform. We also observe relative increases in reconstruction and adjuvant radiation, though trends in these outcomes were not the same across states prior to reform, limiting our ability to draw conclusions about the relationship between reform and these outcomes. Our results suggest that health reform was associated with some improvements in breast cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth Care ReformFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMassachusettsbreast cancerhealth reforminsuranceradiationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34467806
PMCPMC11460560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.