Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467618›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2022

Motivations and outcomes of compatible living donor-recipient pairs in paired exchange.

Valerie Chipman, Matthew Cooper, Alvin G Thomas, Matthew Ronin, Brian Lee, Stuart Flechner, David Leeser, Dorry L Segev, Didier A Mandelbrot, Tyler Lunow-Luke and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Novel Allocation Strategies Can Boost Kidney Exchange Programs: A Monte Carlo Simulation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Navigating a Quandary in Kidney Exchange Programs: A Review of Donor Travel versus Organ Shipment.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  9. Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Increasing Kidney-Exchange Options Within the Existing Living Donor Pool With CIAT: A Pilot Implementation Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  11. Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Valerie ChipmanDivision of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3076-4127
Matthew CooperMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-9638
Alvin G ThomasDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4911-8192
Matthew RoninNational Kidney Registry, Babylon, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-7586
Brian LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-9539
Stuart FlechnerGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8172-3918
David LeeserDepartment of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-4801
Didier A MandelbrotDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3326-8583
Tyler Lunow-LukeDivision of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Shareef SyedDivision of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-778X
Garet HilNational Kidney Registry, Babylon, New York, USA.
Chris E FreiseDivision of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8314-4717
Amy D WatermanDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7799-0060
Garrett R RollDivision of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6241-7037
University of California, San Francisco · USNational Kidney Foundation · USCleveland Clinic · USEast Carolina University · USGeorgetown University · USNational Marrow Donor Program · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training GrantT32HL007055 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wayne D. Rosamond · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
Patient Oriented Research in Solid Organ TransplantationK24AI144954 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2020 to 2024
$956k
Genetic and Environmental Drivers of Cognitive Resilience in Aging PopulationsF99AG073565 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THOMAS, ALVIN G. · 2021 to 2022
$94k
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases K24AI144954NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007055NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI144954NIA NIH HHS F99 AG073565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing numbers of compatible pairs are choosing to enter paired exchange programs, but motivations, outcomes, and system-level effects of participation are not well described. Using a linkage of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and National Kidney Registry, we compared outcomes of traditional (originally incompatible) recipients to originally compatible recipients using the Kaplan-Meier method. We identified 154 compatible pairs. Most pairs sought to improve HLA matching. Compared to the original donor, actual donors were younger (39 vs. 50 years, p < .001), less often female (52% vs. 68%, p < .01), higher BMI (27 vs. 25 kg/m², p = .03), less frequently blood type O (36% vs. 80%, p < .001), and had higher eGFR (99 vs. 94 ml/min/1.73 m², p = .02), with a better LKDPI (median 7 vs. 22, p < .001). We observed no differences in graft failure or mortality. Compatible pairs made 280 additional transplants possible, many in highly sensitized recipients with long wait times. Compatible pair recipients derived several benefits from paired exchange, including better donor quality. Living donor pairs should receive counseling regarding all options available, including kidney paired donation. As more compatible pairs choose to enter exchange programs, consideration should be given to optimizing compatible pair and hard-to-transplant recipient outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementDonor SelectionFemaleHumansLiving DonorsMotivationTransplant Recipientsclinical decision-makingclinical research/practicedonors and donation: paired exchangehealth services and outcomes researchkidney transplantation: living donorkidney transplantation/nephrologypatient education

Identifiers

PMID34467618
PMCPMC10016327
OpenAlexW3196339980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.