Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467615›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2021

HOIP limits anti-tumor immunity by protecting against combined TNF and IFN-gamma-induced apoptosis.

Andrew J Freeman, Stephin J Vervoort, Jessica Michie, Kelly M Ramsbottom, John Silke, Conor J Kearney, Jane Oliaro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CD4Nature cancer · 2023
    Review
  16. HOIP modulates the stability of GPx4 by linear ubiquitination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J FreemanCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-5617
Stephin J VervoortSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Jessica MichieCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Kelly M RamsbottomCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
John SilkeInflammation Department, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7611-5774
Conor J KearneySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Jane OliaroCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-6428
The University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of cancer immunotherapy is limited to a subset of patients, highlighting the need to identify the processes by which tumors evade immunity. Using CRISPR/Cas9 screening, we reveal that melanoma cells lacking HOIP, the catalytic subunit of LUBAC, are highly susceptible to both NK and CD8

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesUbiquitin-Protein LigasesApoptosisHumansInterferon-gammaSignal TransductionTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaInterferon-gammaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCRISPR screenHOIPIFN-gammaimmunotherapyTNF

Identifiers

PMID34467615
PMCPMC8567220
OpenAlexW3196721108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.