Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467598›Full record

Trial reportAddiction biology2022

Effects of cannabidiol in cannabis flower: Implications for harm reduction.

Laurel P Gibson, Hollis C Karoly, Jarrod M Ellingson, Jost Klawitter, Cristina Sempio, Julia E Squeri, Angela D Bryan, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Research Progress on Cannabinoids inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laurel P GibsonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6684-2126
Hollis C KarolyDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1232-1202
Jarrod M EllingsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-2656
Jost KlawitterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-4820
Cristina SempioDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-612X
Julia E SqueriDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Angela D BryanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-3380
L Cinnamon BidwellDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-7586
Kent E HutchisonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4805-9277
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Marijuana Harm Reduction: Innovative Strategies for Developing New KnowledgeR01DA039707 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUTCHISON, KENT E. · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Common mechanisms of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in alcohol use disorder and depression: A genetically informed investigationK23AA026635 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ELLINGSON, JARROD MARTIN · 2018 to 2022
$907k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA026635NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a federally compatible, naturalistic at-home administration procedure, the present study examined the acute effects of three cannabis flower chemovars with different tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to cannabidiol (CBD) ratios, in order to test whether chemovars with a higher CBD content produce different effects. Participants were randomly assigned to ad libitum administration of one of three chemovars (THC-dominant: 24% THC, 1% CBD; THC+CBD: 9% THC, 10% CBD; CBD-dominant: 1% THC, 23% CBD); 159 regular cannabis users (male = 94, female = 65) were assessed in a mobile pharmacology lab before, immediately after, and 1 h after ad libitum administration of their assigned chemovar. Plasma cannabinoids as well as positive (e.g., high, elation) and negative (e.g., paranoia and anxiety) subjective effects were assessed at each time points. Participants who used the CBD-dominant and THC + CBD chemovars had significantly less THC and more CBD in plasma samples compared to participants who used the THC-dominant chemovar. Further, the THC + CBD chemovar was associated with similar levels of positive subjective effects, but significantly less paranoia and anxiety, as compared to the THC-dominant chemovar. This is one of the first studies to examine the differential effects of various THC to CBD ratios using chemovars that are widely available in state-regulated markets. Individuals using a THC + CBD chemovar had significantly lower plasma THC concentrations and reported less paranoia and anxiety while also reporting similar positive mood effects as compared to individuals using THC only, which is intriguing from a harm reduction perspective. Further research is needed to clarify the harm reduction potential of CBD in cannabis products.

Indexed as

AdultCannabidiolCannabisDronabinolFemaleFlowersHarm ReductionHumansMaleMiddle AgedCannabidiolDronabinolcannabidiolcannabinoidsmarijuanasubjective effectstetrahydrocannabinol

Identifiers

PMID34467598
PMCPMC9357513
OpenAlexW3198152184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.