Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467557›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

A decision framework for estimating the cost of marine plastic pollution interventions.

Erin L Murphy, Miranda Bernard, Gwenllian Iacona, Stephanie B Borrelle, Megan Barnes, Alexis McGivern, Jorge Emmanuel, Leah R Gerber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Public preferences for marine plastic litter management across Europe.Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A decision framework for estimating the cost of marine plastic pollution interventions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin L MurphySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4910-4903
Miranda BernardSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-6265
Gwenllian IaconaCenter for Biodiversity Outcomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-3895
Stephanie B BorrelleDavid H. Smith Conservation Research Program, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-7354
Megan BarnesCentre for Environmental Economics & Policy, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-0975
Alexis McGivernSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-9654
Jorge EmmanuelInstitute of Environmental and Marine Sciences, Silliman University, Dumaguete, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-4913
Leah R GerberSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-6842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine plastic pollution has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. Although there has been a surge in global investment for implementing interventions to mitigate plastic pollution, there has been little attention given to the cost of these interventions. We developed a decision support framework to identify the economic, social, and ecological costs and benefits of plastic pollution interventions for different sectors and stakeholders. We calculated net cost as a function of six cost and benefit categories with the following equation: cost of implementing an intervention (direct, indirect, and nonmonetary costs) minus recovered costs and benefits (monetary and nonmonetary) produced by the interventions. We applied our framework to two quantitative case studies (a solid waste management plan and a trash interceptor) and four comparative case studies, evaluating the costs of beach cleanups and waste-to-energy plants in various contexts, to identify factors that influence the costs of plastic pollution interventions. The socioeconomic context of implementation, the spatial scale of implementation, and the time scale of evaluation all influence costs and the distribution of costs across stakeholders. Our framework provides an approach to estimate and compare the costs of a range of interventions across sociopolitical and economic contexts.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPlasticsEnvironmental PollutionPlasticsConservaciónconservationcostos financierosdecision-makingequidadequityfinancial costsplásticosplasticstoma de decisiones保护公平决策塑料财务成本

Identifiers

PMID34467557
PMCPMC9292852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.