Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467453›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Correlation of liver enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver functions: a multicenter-multivendor analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from SORAMIC trial.

Osman Öcal, Bora Peynircioglu, Christian Loewe, Otto van Delden, Vincent Vandecaveye, Bernhard Gebauer, Christoph J Zech, Christian Sengel, Irene Bargellini, Roberto Iezzi and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SIRT in 2025.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.

Osman ÖcalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Bora PeynirciogluDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Christian LoeweSection of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Otto van DeldenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent VandecaveyeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph J ZechRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian SengelRadiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
Irene BargelliniDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto IezziDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Rome, Italy.
Alberto BenitoAbdominal Radiology Unit, Deparment of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Kerstin SchütteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany.
Antonio GasbarriniFondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Università' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Ricarda SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Moritz WildgruberDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Maciej PechDepartments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter MalfertheinerDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. max.seidensticker@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAcademic Medical Center · NLAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHacettepe University · TRKU Leuven · BELMU Klinikum · DEMarienhospital Osnabrück · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase and liver function parameters in a multicenter, multivendor study.

methodsA total of 359 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using a standardized protocol with various scanners within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC) were evaluated. The correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase normalized to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio, LSR) and biochemical laboratory parameters, clinical findings related to liver functions, liver function grading systems (Child-Pugh and Albumin-Bilirubin [ALBI]), and scanner characteristics were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.

resultsThere was a significant positive correlation between LSR and albumin (rho = 0.193; p < 0.001), platelet counts (rho = 0.148; p = 0.004), and sodium (rho = 0.161; p = 0.002); and a negative correlation between LSR and total bilirubin (rho = -0.215; p < 0.001) and AST (rho = -0.191; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed independent significance for each of albumin (p = 0.022), total bilirubin (p = 0.045), AST (p = 0.031), platelet counts (p = 0.012), and sodium (p = 0.006). The presence of ascites (1.47 vs. 1.69, p < 0.001) and varices (1.55 vs. 1.69, p = 0.006) was related to significantly lower LSR. Similarly, patients with ALBI grade 1 had significantly higher LSR than patients with grade 2 (1.74 ± 0.447 vs. 1.56 ± 0.408, p < 0.001); and Child-Pugh A patients had a significantly higher LSR than Child-Pugh B (1.67 ± 0.44 vs. 1.49 ± 0.33, p = 0.021). Also, LSR was negatively correlated with MELD-Na scores (rho = -0.137; p = 0.013). However, one scanner brand was significantly associated with lower LSR (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is correlated with biomarkers of liver functions in a multicenter cohort. However, this correlation shows variations between scanner brands. KEY POINTS: • The correlation between liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and liver function is consistent in a multicenter-multivendor cohort. • Signal intensity-based indices (liver-to-spleen ratio) can be used as an imaging biomarker of liver function. • However, absolute values might change between vendors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGadoxetic acidHepatocellular carcinomaLiver functionLiver-to-spleen ratioMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34467453
PMCPMC8795026
OpenAlexW3198355004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.