Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467447›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021

Human motion capture for movement limitation analysis using an RGB-D camera in spondyloarthritis: a validation study.

Manuel Trinidad-Fernández, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Peter Vaes, David Beckwée, Francisco-Ángel Moreno, Javier González-Jiménez, Antonio Fernández-Nebro, Sara Manrique-Arija, Inmaculada Ureña-Garnica, Manuel González-Sánchez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel Trinidad-FernándezDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, Grupo de Clinimetría (F-14), Málaga, Spain.
Antonio Cuesta-VargasDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, Grupo de Clinimetría (F-14), Málaga, Spain. acuesta@uma.es.
Peter VaesRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Francisco-Ángel MorenoMAPIR-UMA Group, Department Ingeniería de Sistemas Y Automática, Instituto de Investigación Biomédico de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Javier González-JiménezMAPIR-UMA Group, Department Ingeniería de Sistemas Y Automática, Instituto de Investigación Biomédico de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Antonio Fernández-NebroUGC de Reumatología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Sara Manrique-ArijaUGC de Reumatología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Inmaculada Ureña-GarnicaUGC de Reumatología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Manuel González-SánchezDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, Grupo de Clinimetría (F-14), Málaga, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversity of Antwerp · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A human motion capture system using an RGB-D camera could be a good option to understand the trunk limitations in spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study is to validate a human motion capture system using an RGB-D camera to analyse trunk movement limitations in spondyloarthritis patients. Cross-sectional study was performed where spondyloarthritis patients were diagnosed with a rheumatologist. The RGB-D camera analysed the kinematics of each participant during seven functional tasks based on rheumatologic assessment. The OpenNI2 library collected the depth data, the NiTE2 middleware detected a virtual skeleton and the MRPT library recorded the trunk positions. The gold standard was registered using an inertial measurement unit. The outcome variables were angular displacement, angular velocity and lineal acceleration of the trunk. Criterion validity and the reliability were calculated. Seventeen subjects (54.35 (11.75) years) were measured. The Bending task obtained moderate results in validity (r = 0.55-0.62) and successful results in reliability (ICC = 0.80-0.88) and validity and reliability of angular kinematic results in Chair task were moderate and (r = 0.60-0.74, ICC = 0.61-0.72). The kinematic results in Timed Up and Go test were less consistent. The RGB-D camera was documented to be a reliable tool to assess the movement limitations in spondyloarthritis depending on the functional tasks: Bending task. Chair task needs further research and the TUG analysis was not validated. Comparation of both systems, required software for camera analysis, outcomes and final results of validity and reliability of each test.

Indexed as

MovementPostural BalanceSpondylarthritisBiomechanical PhenomenaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTime and Motion StudiesBASFICameraMotion captureSpinal mobilitySpondyloarthritis

Identifiers

PMID34467447
PMCPMC8440303
OpenAlexW3198264432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.