Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467435›Full record

ReviewEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2022

Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Yasushi Toh, Masaru Morita, Manabu Yamamoto, Yuichiro Nakashima, Masahiko Sugiyama, Hideo Uehara, Yoshiaki Fujimoto, Yuki Shin, Keiichi Shiokawa, Emi Ohnishi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Assessing the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on quality of life during treatment in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Latent profile analysis of potential health-promoting behaviors in patients after esophageal cancer surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient-reported outcomes following esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Nature, severity, and impact of chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia following curative resection for esophageal cancer: a cross-sectional study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yasushi TohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan. toh.yasushi.nkcc.prs.8@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-0740
Masaru MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Manabu YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Yuichiro NakashimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Masahiko SugiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Hideo UeharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Yoshiaki FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Yuki ShinDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Keiichi ShiokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
Emi OhnishiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomonari ShimagakiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yohei ManoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Keishi SugimachiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the poorest prognosis. Esophagectomy, which is the mainstay of curative-intent treatments, imposes excessive surgical stress on the patients, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy remain high. On the other hand, the number of survivors after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is increasing due to recent improvements in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatments for this cancer. However, esophagectomy still has a great influence on the fundamental aspect of patients' lives, that is, the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), including their physical, emotional, and social functions in the short- and long-term postoperatively. HR-QOL is a multifactorial concept used to assess the symptoms and functional changes caused by the disease itself and treatments from the patients' perspectives. Therefore, assessing the HR-QOL of patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy is becoming increasingly important. However, the status of HR-QOL changes after esophagectomy has not been satisfactorily evaluated, and there is no worldwide consensus as to how the postoperative HR-QOL can be improved. This review aimed to raise awareness of healthcare providers, such as surgeons and nurses, on the importance of HR-QOL in patients with esophageal cancer after curative-intent esophagectomy by providing multifaceted information concerning the short- and long-term HR-QOLs, including the status of changes and the determinants of HR-QOL after esophagectomy, and furthermore, essential points for improvement of HR-QOL after esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeEsophagectomyHumansPostoperative PeriodEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyHealth-related quality of lifeSurvivors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.