Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467415›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Primary total knee replacement for tibial plateau fractures in older patients: a systematic review of 197 patients.

V Tapper, A Toom, K Pamilo, T Niinimäki, J Nieminen, S Nurmi, T Kortekangas, J Paloneva

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

V TapperCentral Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland. valtteri.tapper@ksshp.fi.
A ToomCentral Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
K PamiloCentral Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
T NiinimäkiOulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
J NieminenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland.
S NurmiTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
T KortekangasOulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
J PalonevaCentral Finland Hospital, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Central Finland Health Care District · FIOulu University Hospital · FICoxa Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTibial plateau fractures are typically treated with osteosynthesis. In older patients, osteosynthesis is associated with some complications, risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and long partial, or non-weight bearing during the recovery phase. To avoid these problems, primary total knee replacement (TKR) has become an increasingly common treatment option. The aim of this study was to evaluate all the relevant literature and summarize the current evidence-based knowledge on the treatment of tibial plateau fractures with primary TKR in older patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search of studies on total knee replacement (TKR) as primary treatment for acute traumatic tibial plateau fracture was conducted using OVID Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from 1946 to 18 November 2019. We included all studies without restrictions regarding total knee replacement (TKR) as primary treatment for acute traumatic tibial plateau fracture.

resultsOf the 640 reviewed articles, 16 studies with a total of 197 patients met the inclusion criteria. No controlled trials were available, and the overall quality of the literature was low. The results, using different clinical scoring systems, were good or fair. Four-year follow-up complication (6.1%) and revision (3.6%) rates after primary TKR appeared to be lower than after secondary TKR (complication rate 20-48%, revision rate 8-20%) but higher than after elective primary TKR.

conclusionBased on low-quality evidence, TKR appears to be a useful treatment option for tibial plateau fractures in older patients. Controlled trials are mandatory to determine the relative superiority of these two options as primary treatment of tibial plateau fractures in older patients.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeTibial FracturesAgedFracture Fixation, InternalHumansTibiaTreatment OutcomeKneeOsteosynthesisPrimary total knee replacementSurgeryTibial plateau fractureTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID34467415
PMCPMC9522836
OpenAlexW3198151224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.