Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467343›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2021

Revisiting the Origin of Nanopore Current Blockage for Volume Difference Sensing at the Atomic Level.

Meng-Yin Li, Yi-Lun Ying, Jie Yu, Shao-Chuang Liu, Ya-Qian Wang, Shuang Li, Yi-Tao Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nanopore-Based Detection of Protein Posttranslational Modifications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Single-Molecule Electrical Profiling of Peptides and Proteins.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meng-Yin LiState Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P.R. China.
Yi-Lun YingState Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-256X
Jie YuSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P.R. China.
Shao-Chuang LiuState Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P.R. China.
Ya-Qian WangSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P.R. China.
Shuang LiSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P.R. China.
Yi-Tao LongState Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-7457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in the nanopore ionic current during entry of a target molecule underlie the sensing capability and dominate the intensity and extent of applications of the nanopore approach. The volume exclusion model has been proposed and corrected to describe the nanopore current blockage. However, increasing evidence shows nonconformity with this model, suggesting that the ionic current within a nanopore should be entirely reconsidered. Here, we revisit the origin of nanopore current blockage from a theoretical perspective and propose that the noncovalent interactions between a nanopore and a target molecule affect the conductance of the solution inside the nanopore, leading to enhanced current blockage. Moreover, by considering the example of an aerolysin nanopore discriminating the cytosine DNA and methylcytosine DNA that differ by a single methyl group, we completely demonstrate, by nanopore experiments and molecular dynamics simulations, the essential nature of this noncovalent interaction for discrimination. Our conductance model suggests multiplicative effects of both volume exclusion and noncovalent interaction on the current blockage and provides a new strategy to achieve volume difference sensing at the atomic level with highly specific current events, which would promote the nanopore protein sequencing and its applications in real-life systems.

Identifiers

PMID34467343
PMCPMC8395674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.