Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467266›Full record

ReviewJACS Au2021

Membrane-Disrupting Molecules as Therapeutic Agents: A Cautionary Note.

Steven L Regen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACS Au, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mechanisms of Triton X-100 reducing the AgWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven L RegenDepartment of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-7916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic studies have shown that aggregates of a common membrane disrupting molecule, Triton X-100, destroy the integrity of cholesterol-rich phospholipid bilayers via a catastrophic rupture process. In sharp contrast, attack on such membranes by monomers of Triton X-100 destroys their integrity through mild leakage events. This discovery of duplicity in the destruction of membrane integrity by a membrane-disrupting molecule has led to the design of derivatives of Amphotericin B that exhibit a lower tendency to aggregate and antifungal and hemolytic activities that are well-separated. An animal study with one such derivative has shown that its efficacy is similar to that of Amphotericin B but with substantially reduced toxicity. A related

Identifiers

PMID34467266
PMCPMC8395607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.