Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34467238›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2021

Evaluating the Safety of Performing Flexible Cystoscopy When Urinalysis Suggests Presence of "Infection": Results of a Prospective Clinical Study in 2350 patients.

Matthew Trail, Julia Cullen, Emma Fulton, Faye Clayton, Ewan McGregor, Faye McWilliam, Lachlan Dick, Pota Kalima, Roland Donat, Paramananthan Mariappan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew TrailDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Julia CullenDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Emma FultonDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Faye ClaytonDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Ewan McGregorDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Faye McWilliamDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Lachlan DickDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Pota KalimaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Roland DonatDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Paramananthan MariappanDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Western General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is significant underutilisation of allocated health service resources when a scheduled flexible cystoscopy (FC) is cancelled because a pre-cystoscopy urinalysis (PCU) suggests "infection", despite patients being asymptomatic for urinary tract infection (UTI).

objectiveTo evaluate the risk of UTI or urinary sepsis when FC is performed in asymptomatic patients with a PCU positive for leucocyte esterase and/or nitrites. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsA prospective cohort study was conducted in a high-volume UK centre recruiting all patients undergoing outpatient FC.

interventionA protocol was developed to guide response to PCU performed prior to FC, which was performed regardless of the result, unless patients were symptomatic for UTI. All patients completed a questionnaire to identify risk factors and were followed up via a telephone survey and a review of electronic clinical records. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Post-FC UTI was defined as hospital admission with UTI/urinary sepsis or if patients were symptomatic for UTI with receipt of antibiotics or with positive urine culture and sensitivity. An analysis of the association was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: An initial pilot study confirmed the safety and feasibility of our protocol. Of 1996 patients, 136 (6.8%) developed a UTI by our definition, with 51 (2.6%) having a culture-proven infection. The risk was higher in patients with a positive PCU (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-2.40,

conclusionsWe observed a clinically low and acceptable risk of UTI, with no incidence of sepsis, when FC was performed in asymptomatic patients with a PCU suggesting "infection". Routine cancellation of these patients is unnecessary and may worsen the burden on health service resources. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the safety of performing flexible cystoscopy when the urine dipstick on the day suggested presence of an "infection" but the patient had no symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI). Our study in over 2000 patients demonstrated a low incidence of UTI, and none of these patients developed sepsis. We therefore recommend that flexible cystoscopy should not be cancelled automatically on the basis of the dipstick result alone, as it might delay a time-sensitive crucial diagnosis.

Indexed as

Antibiotic prophylaxisBladder cancerCystoscopyMicrobiologyProtocolSafetySurveillanceUrinalysisUrinary tract infectionUrosepsis

Identifiers

PMID34467238
PMCPMC8385291
OpenAlexW3186312071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.