Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34466785›Full record

ReviewiScience2021

Challenges and triumphs in cryo-electron tomography.

Ryan K Hylton, Matthew T Swulius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cloneable contrast across all biological length scales.Journal of structural biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Cryogenic electron tomography by the numbers: Charting underexplored lineages in structural cell biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The amazing AAV capsids: Into the structure-verse.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Review
  11. Cryogenic light microscopy of vitrified samples with angstrom precision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan K HyltonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Matthew T SwuliusDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron tomography has stepped fully into the spotlight. Enthusiasm is high. Fortunately for us, this is an exciting time to be a cryotomographer, but there is still a way to go before declaring victory. Despite its potential, cryo-electron tomography possesses many inherent challenges. How do we image through thick cell samples, and possibly even tissue? How do we identify a protein of interest amidst the noisy, crowded environment of the cytoplasm? How do we target specific moments of a dynamic cellular process for tomographic imaging? In this review, we cover the history of cryo-electron tomography and how it came to be, roughly speaking, as well as the many approaches that have been developed to overcome its intrinsic limitations.

Indexed as

BiochemistryCell biologyStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID34466785
PMCPMC8383006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.